And just like Ed Wood, I nailed it! :p
I voted before checking the reveal at MS 66 not FS (seems to be the same case as the first one)
I will support @Lehigh96 's honesty as I recall previous threads where his vote was different from the revealed grade (and he is an honest one in...
TLDR version: it's complicated; there are good, bad, and average coins in all slabs; see bottom for some nice coins.....but better yet, read the...
MS 66 not FS....fields are clean; rim worries me a bit (even if it is not damage, I think it detracts from a higher grade)
It does seem to have AU details but that dink could be the reason. And you are wise to not play the regrading game (at least with this coin, as...
Anacs is better in terms of fees, especially if you submit on one of their specials. And they are solid, especially when it comes to Morgans. I...
Nowadays you are correct but in the early days of grading services it was more common. At one point there were only three "common" grades:...
I would say it's a 64 (65 if lucky and 63 if the divot mentioned previously is significant in hand) ....I would likely not send this to grade. As...
I was thinking between XF 45 and AU 50....ended up going with AU 50 (no Ed Wood here :p).
MS 61 ....I could see 60 to 62 and decided to go in the middle....lots of bag marks/chatter; given that it's one of the older ANA slabs, I think...
AU 55 ....obverse looks super strong and I'm guessing the reverse is a weak strike (initially I was thinking it was an XF grade but the obverse...
Finally got around to this... 1,2, & 7 were my "no" votes 3,4,5,6,8,9,10 were my "yes" 5 steps votes 1 and 2 were the ones I was most confident...
Looking forward to seeing the results! Good luck!
MS 63....great luster with some hits in the fields; maybe it got up to 64 but I think Anacs was more conservative on this one and said 63
It's unfortunate and frustrating that one can't get past the AI and mindless folks at eBay. It should be easier to clear up things like this.
[ATTACH]
Me too and I'm not even a horse!
They could have missed it, had a mechanical error (even back in the early era they made mistakes) or they were super conservative and felt it did...
I think they were as I found an NGC 3.0 (gold foil logo on reverse) with the FB designation. This is from GC: [IMG] [IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
