Just looking at the condition would cause me to pass on it. However, I'm going to take a chance and say Bradley has it right. Looks off to me...
One of the many reasons I only buy PMG graded obsolete currency. Thanks for the link Steve; it's a great site.
Too many nos on this coin. I would pass.
I'll go with what longshot said. An 1889 CC in AU goes for thousands. No TPG (PCGS/NGC) slab makes me filled with caution. I wouldn't buy it.
I'll be pleased to Second what Robert Ransom said. Sumpin wrong with that coin.
Most interesting. All these years and the first time I've seen that label. Thanks for posting.
This is, perhaps the best comment on your coin. I have one like yours. A used, cleaned 1922 Peace dollar that my Dad gave me many, many years...
Pictures? And look how the coin is being handled. Even a G08 1795 rates a TPG slab. I would pass if I were offered the coin.
So, they're bad pics. Even if they were 'excellent' pics I'd still want to see it in hand. Just my preference; that's all.
I'm very sorry for your loss. My best guess would MS 63 for all. Nice coins by the way.
Google Arthur L. and Ira S. Friedberg
Ain't nothin' ugly about gold. Looks good to me. :cigar:
Can't wait to see that. I'm sure it will be most interesting. Love that ring collection.
Some more buried treasure for you. Ya did good, as you always do.
Very easy to interpret: No well known TPG Slab I pass - pictures of the coin do not matter. With Photo Shop, etc it's too easy to juice a pic....
A 'fake' on Etsy. I'm shocked!
PS: No top three TPG Slab I pass. Just a personal preference.
Anytime anyone buys something on line and with pictures they take a chance. Unless the seller is, or hires a, professional photographer most...
Not me. It's all wrinkled up. :joyful:
I would think if you used an eraser, or any item you have to rub, you can forget any value. Sorry about that and I do hope someone knows a way to...
Separate names with a comma.