The 1917-D is AU58 at worst. What a bargain!
I had a mail-order business at the time and occasionally sold to this guy who wanted to buy some coins as investments. For his first purchase,...
The word you want is vise, not vice. Different animals.
Have you seen any error coins selling for that kind of money? I suppose they could make a thousand $10,000 coins. Oh wait, wouldn't that make each...
I would call it AU55 and don't think the ding is that bad. If I were selling the coin I would describe it as being nice AU with a minor reverse...
When I retired from the university where I taught, I wound up with some extra cash so I decided to buy some coins with it. Over the years, I had...
Without all the scratches, I would call it VF-XF.
I hate to be a Christmas Grinch, but I disagree with those who say it has a nice look. I agree with the responders who say it's a VG10. Back in...
I do remember successfully returning a coin I had bought from a Heritage auction. It was a fairly common S-mint Washington quarter, probably in...
I've bought many coins from Heritage, mostly through their Exclusively Internet auctions. I've also sold coins at auction through Heritage, about...
If it's that hard to see, it's not worth looking for.
You're trying too hard. If an "error" requires that much magnification to be seen, it's not worth finding.
64
I found one of these in a roll and listed it on eBay at 99c for the opening bid. It went for .99!
Problem coins remain problem coins. Don't buy it, particularly not if you're interested in it for investment purposes.
The answer to your question is no, it's not undergraded.
Early PCI slabs with the green labels were generally right on the money. I sent 6 such coins to PCGS fairly recently. Four came back with the same...
Harshly cleaned. Look elsewhere.
40 and I like the look of it.
63 no bands
Separate names with a comma.
