Chris said "It will probably cost you more than its worth to have it graded." I would change that to "It will DEFINITELY cost you more than its...
VG would be my guess.
I thought it looked like a "D."
That sounds about right.
Surface looks way too rough to me, grainy is the right word thanks to John Milton above.
1938-D W-L 50c in change at a cafeteria in the early '60s. It was worth about $2.50 at the time, and I remember telling the people I had eaten...
Looks like something that should be slabbed! Not!
$6 perhaps?
Who cares what the date is. The coin is so awful that it's hard to imagine who would want it. Someone working on a PCGS low-ball collection perhaps?
64, too much damage to cheek.
I clicked on several of the above and each time got a message to the effect that this site can't be reached.
Looked to me like clear Ds in the two pictures. You need to have it certified by either ANACS, NGC, or PCGS if you're interested in selling it.
no and no
Looks like a "spender" to me.
Worst looking S I've seen. Obviously if it's a genuine 1909-S VDB, it's worth getting certified. On the other hand, . . . .
64. Nick on the cheek.
I like it better, also.
I did most of my roll searching and looking through change in the 50s, and I found lots of good stuff: Buffalo nickels, key and semikey Lincolns,...
This reminds me of a 1931-S Lincoln that I bought in the late 60s from a hole-in-the-wall coin shop on Royal Street in the French Quarter of New...
If you're thinking of buying it, don't. If you already own it, get rid of it as soon as you can. In my opinion, it's basically worthless although...
Separate names with a comma.
