I have had good luck with E-Z-Est as well, Kurt. Haze came right off.
barrell fulls of 1950-D Jefferson Nickels??? why would they counterfeit a low value coin?
MS-65
And they made S Mint SBAs for circulation as well. The 1981 SBAs were struck for Mint and collector sets only. They were not struck for...
They were intended for circulation and that’s close enough for me. He’s right. And not just theoretically, he’s technically right. The Sacagawea...
I sit corrected. :)
hi cheech... I wonder what's in the water here lately???
@David Setree Rare Coins 2018-1974=44 but who's doing math?
by what method would you do this Finn? I'm curious as to what you feel is the best way to remove corrosion from a coin so that it straight grades?
that reverse is not real the V.D.B. is off center just as it would be on a real specimen
yes, but it's been over 40 years since they coined S Mints for circulation
It is on a genuine V.D.B. as well, Kentucky
I agree that it wouldn't seem like a candidate that I would suspect, but the detail is all wrong. It's not genuine, that much I can tell you.
I agree with both of you. The certification is more of an assurance that the color is deemed natural.
this sounds dangerously close to market grading these coins... you're contradicting yourself, @baseball21
Looks counterfeit. The reverse looks wrong. The obverse looks correct, but the reverse looks completely wrong.
You mean D mint coins. S Mint coins aren't released into circulation :)
nail polish remover is NOT pure acetone
Always remember this, Kurt... Just because you're actually paranoid does NOT mean that those cars aren't following you...
The Carpenters didn't use hammers. Well, except for Richard when he played keyboards...
Separate names with a comma.
