The top two would be PCGS or NGC. If the coin is a 1882-P imo it wouldn't be worth submitting unless it was an MS65 or higher, because the grading...
My grading of SLQs is poor, with that said, my guess is 64.
Nice coin! I don't think I've ever seen toning like that, very interesting.
I agree with Krispy; the toning has some great colors, but I find the fingerprints too distracting.
Very well thought out, great thread Jason :thumb:.
Very nice coin Lehigh, the strike is much stronger, and that toning is impressive. Definitely an upgrade :thumb:.
You got that right! That is a fantastic coin :thumb:, if it wasn't for the rim I think it could definitely pass for a proof.
The Gambler :D
Very clean coin, nice Morgan Jim :thumb:. I agree the '03-O has a great history, good thing you didn't buy it 60 years ago :D.
What type of browser do you use? (Firefox, Chrome, IE). Usually on the control panel, on the top of the browser there is a bookmark this page...
You can also bookmark the page with your browser, this will let you name it whatever you want, that's the way I do it with Firefox. Hey Lehigh...
Yep, it's in their guidelines for the star designation. NGC's Star Designation It could also mean both sides are semi-prooflike, or one side is PL...
There actually are AU Prooflike and even a few DMPL Morgans out there. Heritage Search So it would be possible for an AU coin to get a star for...
Nice coin, it's pretty clean, besides the hit on Jefferson's temple, it's a little weakly struck, so I would say 65, unless weak struck examples...
Nice Morgan :thumb:.
Nice pickup :thumb:. I bet it will look a little better in hand.
That's a fair price for a '42-D in 66.
Illini the Barber "lady"? :bigeyes: Beautiful half, but I can't say the same for the lady :D. She has to be the manliest woman I've ever seen....
I don't think any of the three have a chance at 65.
The pics are still uploaded through CT. To post the pics through photobucket, copy the direct link for the pic (It will be a http link from...
Separate names with a comma.