looks more like a trail die then a die crack and as for how common, I am not sure.
Dimefreak..i hate you! /sarcasm that is a great looking coin and wished i had something like it
i think this coin is a solid 67
I think the nicks on the chin, forehead and a few on the reverse are taking away from the beauty of this coin..66+
Congratz on your new purchases..I really like that Half dime of yours!
Same concept I believe: http://www.cointalk.com/t70588/ http://www.cointalk.com/t141870/ http://www.cointalk.com/t37671/
1862 - about $10 in G4 1864 - about $15 in G4 1879 - about $5 in G4 the others are common dates Are they cleaned?
here is my 70-s S/D Proof..not the best of pictures but at least something to compare it too [IMG]
1. Is BU collection possible? I would say yes (my memorial cent is) 2. Can a coin have carbon spots and be graded..I say yes again and have seen...
I am going to say different..It looks more like a small form of Die Detriation with Mechanical Doubling.
MERC: 65 79 Morgan: 64 (probably or should be a 63 in my mind) 81 Morgan: 64
I would think spenders since there isn't anything special about them (like a binary, radar, repeater etc.) I might keep one for the sake of it but...
Hurry up and post already!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Mike, I think the seller is trying to get to the uninformed and say OMG buy these because they are going to be worth a butt load in years to...
that is an amazing coin...what are you using to take your photos with, I have to ask!
I wouldnt post your email address unless you want SPAM....
Valley coin .35 for direct Fits and .45 for the air-tites with the ring..
Dont use a phone buy a digital camera :)
RLM, very nice coin. I think it's a 65
This one was a tough one to grade especially with the marks on the reverse..I think it should get a 58 but if 1917 were known to have weak dies...
Separate names with a comma.