I once committed the insanity of trading a bunch of key and semikey coins I had found in circulation for Capital plastic holders. One problem I...
xf40
My father received an XF 1917-S obv half in change on a trip we took out West. It was a beautiful coin, with a few dark speckles on the eagle's...
Spender but neat nonetheless.
MS65 with awful toning IMO. I think it's real; look at the B of VDB. But I, like the other responders, wouldn't buy one that wasn't certified.
Dipping it in water or leaving it alone makes no difference. Unless it's a 1931-S or D or one of the 1932s, it's probably not worth more than...
Personally, I would want it certified. Send it to ANACS.
AU50 for both, and I don't like either.
VF25
Obviously, I got into this way too late. I was thinking XF45 on the obverse, AU50 or 53 on the reverse, so probably would have gone with AU50....
60 or 61 PL. Pretty ugly (IMO) for an '80-S.
Have you heard of punctuation?
There are so many grammatical and spelling and wrong word usages in what you write that it's really difficult to make any sense of it.
63 PL
I, too, think I detect wear on both the obverse and the high points of the eagle so nice AU58.
65. I'm not a big fan of toning, but your coin is nice.
Y'all must not have seen my last post: PCGS threw the dice and came up 55!
I'm changing my guess to AU55. However, I peeked. I agree with the grade b/c of the obvious wear on the reverse.
It's a PCGS MS65.
I just took pictures of my example that you might like to see.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
