Great link...Thank You, Sir!...Spark
@Kentucky ...read post #8 again...I was adding some info while you responded...Spark
Yes...there was a recent post that called it that, a few months ago, maybe?...I suppose because the zinc showing imitates doubling..I think...
Agree, you are getting a much better picture through the optics...Spark
I agree...I think you would call it a strike error...the plating was too thin for the pressure of the strike...Spark
Really like your setup, but you are correct that stereo optical zoom trinocular is the best way to go...if you can stand the cost. But don’t...
@Mattellis ...blurry and pixelated photos completely negate your effort. You may be able to see it, but forum members cannot. Get yourself a...
@PassthePuck ...way cool chart...Spark
Quite a few forum members will tell you they absolutely abhor the copper plated zinc cent. I am one of those. Along this life’s journey you...
@Azariana ...1982 had 8 business strike varieties...and a 9th proof out of San Francisco...if another is found of the small date copper, it would...
@Lucky John ...we only tell you the truth, not what you want to hear. This site is dedicated to accurate information...Spark
@Neal ...no foolin’...straight from NGC website...Spark
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] With Curry Company Original Packaging. Currently lists approx. $45. Make me an offer I can’t refuse...Contact by...
@Freddiecallahan ...The mint made over 809 million of these, and everyone and his sister buttonholed them. Unless they are silver or MS60...
I don’t see anything abnormal with the B/LIBERTY, and no clue what the circular device is. I think I see doubling of the vest next to the date,...
Be sure to post a tight close-up of the mint mark for us when you do...please and thank you...Spark
This is a great go-to article to freshen up on the CAM/WAM specifics, useful to many. For clarity, however, the location of the designers...
@Michael Azarian ...just read post #13...obviously you no longer desire any further assistance from me. Best of luck to you...Spark
NO...it isn’t. Nowhere near ddr-001...but you are correct in that the die markers don’t match for ddr-002. And you still have not provided...
Reference post #5...I’ve looked at the ddr-002 at length. OP’s coin needs better pix and lighting to proceed. What I can see is maybe a contact...
Separate names with a comma.
