It’s in a little rough shape. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@SensibleSal66 Either your coin was struck 90* off or you didn’t rotate your photos. My head has a hard time turned in that direction. LOL
It just struck me that it’s either a roll on not and there’s nothing alleged about that. It made me laugh the way I first thought about it. :)
Those are really neat notes. Despite the condition I would hang onto them until more research can be had. @SteveInTampa
Alleged roll?
I’ll take it! Lol
Isn’t that about 13.5 percent? I’d roll and take them to the bank.
I’m not a VAM guy even though I have some.
But I plan on living forever. :) If things keep going up the way they have been it won’t be very long. Lol
$500.00 fir a gallon of milk!? Thinking how much ice cream will cost. That’ll put me in an early grave.
Damaged, nothing but a damaged quarter.
I think you did very good at that price for that coin.
I sell a roll of 50 cents dated 1965 to 1981 for $1.00 a roll in my antique shop. If I can’t get copper cents in circulation it’s not worth it....
To me both are coins. The missing pieces are the fragments.
I’m at F-12, 15 on a good day.
Spellcheck changed just to Judy.
Looks real to me, Judy toned darker than normal. It’s taken a number of hits near areas that still show a tiny bit of red. The coin is 155 years...
That is a far out and groovy statement my man! A stone groove! :smuggrin::) I couldn’t resist @Randy Abercrombie
That’s too long! LOL
I’ll go with what Paddyman said.
Separate names with a comma.
