Exposed to sulphurous environment, then worn from circulation. ...jmho...Spark
...I was thinking like what Fred said, but Paddyman’s theory is plausible as well...Spark
I have been a CT member for 3 1/2 years now, and in that time I have learned many things. One of the foremost is: When the majority of members...
Yes...but I knew obv. would lower it...imo...Spark
....Thanks everyone...great feedback...Spark
[ATTACH] Here is the correct reverse...Spark
I just noticed I used the wrong reverse...sorry...Spark
PCGS Photograded at MS65. This is a VAM 1. It has extra cheek and neck scratches, and I'm wondering how much lower it would grade because of it....
11, 2 and 9 o’clock...Spark
Yes. You are wrong. Let me set you right...(beyond all joking around)... It is an error to think you found an error when it isn’t. Errors are...
I noted your profile indicated you were born in 1945 (male, 75)...so I thought you surely had been collecting longer than both of us. But, I am...
...the denticles are uniform on both sides, so I say it’s authentic. I recently graded a ‘84-O...it was F15 at PCGS Photograde (you can do this...
...so...who’s been collecting longer? You or Charles? Both responses were ambiguous, but I really want to know! I started in 1962 getting...
...maybe if you brace yourself against a tree...Spark
...this looks like plating blister stuff...imo...Spark
...the 1995 cent post #31...Spark
...appears to be the same as the ‘95...I see no MD...Spark
No. This ‘95 is a normal circulated, toned cent, the area in front of the face just hasn’t had tarnish reach it...yet...imo. ...Spark
...yes...the triangle aperture is “slimmer”...the horiz. base of the aperture is shorter on the small date...Spark
My thoughts...this is a business strike with normal toning from circulation. Have you checked it for doubling varieties? Go to doubleddie.com...
Separate names with a comma.
