Chris said it quite accurately. 1921 Morgans are the most generic of this series, so $20 is the best she can get, unless you can find a sucker out...
1856 T II Generally referred to as "variety II".
I notice the 1885 you linked to appears more marred on the obverse, so I will stay with the 66.
66, but Morgans seem to get graded differently to me.
Well, it certainly has MS luster, but slightly weak on high points. That could just be from friction wear, though. I certainly like the look of...
By the way, these are some really amazing close ups. How did you accomplish this, teachmind?
I asked this question in an earlier post, and silent&violent scolded me by saying "it doesn't matter because his sentences are disorganized"....
I know this word! It is rather obscene, though, for this site. Ha, ha!
I must admit, you sure got me laughing at this one!!!
Ironically, teachmind still has the ability to compel us to read and respond to his posts, regardless. Ha, ha!
If you are responding to my post, you sure have me perplexed! Ha, ha!
Good come back! Ha, ha!
Whew, the meanies are out today! Ha, ha!
Don't worry, I have taken far worse. Ha, ha!
I'm going to have to look up that word. Ha, ha!
Too bad they just didn't have better engraving skills back then.
Sorry. Ha, ha!
The 3 ladies standing on the rev. of that large copper coin look like they are in a suggestive pose, ha, ha! Or, are they even ladies?
Yes, good to know you are still hanging in there! I had a very attractive Denarius of Antoninus Pius, 4th Consulate. I wish I kept it.
Is that machine doubling?
Separate names with a comma.
