I cant imagine ever selling it. I get anxious butterflies just talking about it.
No, not really. I focused the last year on saving for the 93S and slowly replacing the ones where I didn’t particularly like the eye appeal....
Yeah, that one is interesting for only a AU58. It is one of my originals from 30 years ago. A slider in the olden days, but marked as BU. I...
Very attractive. I think the marks on her face and across the Eagle breast keep it to a 64. Is the reverse die slightly rotated?
Well, it’s a complicated answer. I am 45. I grew up tagging along with my dad to some really dusty and smokey coin shops. Usually I was sifting...
The list. I collected most of the coins in ICG holders many, many years ago. They were the most logical TPG for me to send them to. [ATTACH]
Been a long time in the making. My set is the classic 97, plus 9. Those extra 9 are: 78 Reverse of 79 79 CC Capped Die 79 S Reverse of 78 80...
Love that silky skin. 65
I pretty much agree with all that. I generally dislike the look of Morgans in that XF range, and will be on ultra eye appeal mode in the AU...
Oh I understand your position and you have respectfully explained it very well. I just have not reached the same conclusion (at least not yet...
I think balls and strikes should be called the same for all coins in a series, even if some years/mm produced amazing coins and other years/mm...
If the grade should be the grade, then why is the 80 S graded harder?
My daughter, first time with no saddle [ATTACH]
I agree, but I dont think Santini would show us a details coin. Right or wrong, I have seen PCGS and NGC overlook what I consider obvious...
Just enough original luster remaining on the periphery to squeak in a AU50
XF45
63PL
64PL Solid hammer strike. Incredible luster with contrast. Unfortunate ding under her chin.
Title says it all. This is the exact coin. Dripping with frosty mist luster. Accurately graded imo. Obviously not expecting the current PCGS...
What would be the point of cheating?
Separate names with a comma.
