I think those slabs are a party of history and the coins should be left in there.
It is really unusual Morgan to me. Super smooth, but absolutely zero cartwheel. Then you tilt in the light and the fields are completely...
Interesting coin. Impossible (for me) to photograph as the colors change from every small tilt. Not vibrant, colorful toning…. Just something...
I believe a RADAR is where the number sequence is read the same forwards and backwards, like a palindrome.
Their pictures are so juiced that it falls into the category of “insanely ridiculous”. But they always have a ton of bidders at extremely high...
AU58
Can I call 1950-1955 proof sets that came in a box a type set? Lol [ATTACH] [ATTACH] And an extra [ATTACH]
Here’s mine. Her twin for a comparison. I tend to look for them with this kinda look. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I’ll go with 12A. Looks like an Alligator Eye and nice clashing. really pretty. 65+
Wow, she is near flawless. Very deserving of 67 or 67+. But I will say 66+ is on the holder.
It’s a nice clash. It also easily seen in front of her lips.
Yikes, look at that poor shield.
This common date 1886 (with some sweet clashing) in a Rattler….. is shockingly clean to me. Zero chance this is MS63 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Do you have an area you think they are seeing as cleaned?
Wow. What a beauty. I’ll go with 66+. Could easily be 67.
Love an honest, well worn Morgan with this look: [ATTACH]
Die Chip? Vam28? She’s beautiful. Picks show a PL obverse. 65 or 66.
Well, that’s I thought at first too. But my eyes are playing tricks on me: [ATTACH] vs [ATTACH]
Key for the series: [IMG]
It might also have a nasty rim ding under the first 8. Hard to say for certain
Separate names with a comma.
