I wish it had similar toning on the obverse.
A new pickup for my fledgling toned Roosevelt set with thanks to WL for his relentless birddog prowess. [IMG]
Looking at the shear number of VAM's for the 1881-S, it appears every 1881-S is a VAM of some sort.
Is this the same 1881-S you were talking about in your previous thread that you thought it was a VAM 59?
New pickup courtesy of Winged Liberty. [IMG] [IMG]
Did you self attribute this particular 1968-S? These photos look nothing like the ones from the link you provided.
Here is a closeup I took of a 1936 D/S 7 years ago. Before I knew about slab cleaners or macro lenses. [IMG]
That may be the prettiest 1955 Proof Jefferson I've seen. They usually don't tone with such nice colors.
Absolutely Gorgeous!!
[IMG]
Did you read the bottom portion of his auction? It looks like you may not even get the date of the coin you bought. Beautiful rainbow toned...
I hope you noticed that the seller only has 1 feedback. I know who bought the 1960-D from Shane's auction. Hopefully he will respond here later....
I was shocked at the results, especially concerning the 1969-S. Since I only collect these for the colorful toning the designation doesn't really...
I doubt it. It's in one or the newer edge view holders. It's possible it may previously been in an older holder and reholdered after several...
Well yes, I have to admit the RD designation is laughable.
This one was from eBay. I've picked them up from several sources including forum members
These are the kinds of Red Lincoln's I love. Technically I don't think it is a 65, but with those colors and luster I don't care. [IMG]
New pickup compliments of Winged Liberty [IMG]
I like both of them a lot. I think both would go 65BN. I would like to see the reverse of both.
The writing was also a little cruder, with the letters not so uniform.
Separate names with a comma.
