I went with 62. Like was mentioned above looks more like strike and die detail/deterioration issues than wear to me. Is that a RPD on the 1?...
I thought it was 64, but I don’t know the impact of the reverse scratch.
I’m thinking it’s a 45, maybe a 40.
MS67 but again I don’t collect Morgan’s or graded coins. Playing the GTG to try and get better. The reverse is fantastic. Looks slight wear in...
MS63. Reverse looks quite a bit nicer than the obverse.
MS-66. I don’t collect Morgan’s or slabbed coins so I’ll be interested to see how I do. Really nice coin.
James - if you want to know what the date is you can use nic-a-date on it. Can get it from your local coin store, eBay, wherever. It will...
I would say 67 FSB, possibly even 67+. That’s a clean coin.
I went 67 6FS though there is a contact mark through steps 4-6 that maybe took the steps assignment away, which would suck because it’s such a...
MS67. Maybe a 66. Nice coin.
Regardless of whatever number a TPG gave it, for me it has ‘the look’. Most appealing Morgan i’ve Seen in a long time.
Great coin. I went 63PL. Outstanding piece.
The 3-piece 1976 ‘red’ set had an S minted non-proof Kennedy. This is to BU 40% coin.
Nice find. Oddly enough, after having found many 100’s of proof Kennedy’s in circulation I find tha the ‘76 is actually the most common proof...
I would say it’s certainly PMD. Looks like tooling marks at the removal areas. Nice pick ups overall.
I’m saying 67+, I don’t know how to tell FBL so I’m abstaining from that portion. Overall an outstanding piece.
[ATTACH] I bought a lot of 45 V nickels off eBay based on some really crappy photos. Looked like a reasonably nice 1886 was sitting in the middle...
63, 64, 64. Really like the buffalo but all nice coins.
Ok, AU-63*. :).
May be some wear in the buffalo shoulder and the high points on the hair. I am terrible about discerning wear from strike details and quality...
Separate names with a comma.
