Wheaties for breakfast!:woot:
Don't see a double eye and mouth. The "ring" I think you're pointing to is part of the design.
The first 35 paid line standers.
It's in the law Phil. I don't have an issue with the Marshalls getting them early.
Good luck finding any for sale at your price. To the OP 20 bucks a piece isn't a bad deal IMO.
Severely gouged and dinged. Not a mint error. Spend it.
WAM. Here's a pic I made. I think it's helpful to show both reverses together. You can copy it to your pics to refer to if you like. [ATTACH]
The mintmark position looks spot on. Check here to see if you can match up die...
Wow, that one had it all. Color, strike, key date, a coin to die for...............:inpain:
Or maybe we just give up.
If you disregard old copper because it has practally no melt value I think you're selling the hobby short. I personally don't feel these are...
Because of the weakness of the strike on the reverse oposite of the missing layer I'm pretty sure it was missing before the strike. Edit: never...
Nice find. Yes, that one has some value.
20 bucks?:jawdrop:
Regarding that ONE, the N is backwards. This is what happens when you place a coin on top of another a smash them together, you end up with...
The easiest way is look at the R in TRUST. On the quarter the bottom of the R is partially covered by leaves. On the half it isn't.
In '54 proofs were struck at Philadelphia with no mintmark. Buy a Redbook. A couple hits.
On some of these partially detached laminations the "flap" can be as thin as tin foil and gets crumpled in circulation. I'm not sure about that...
How can you be Profit man if you never sell?
What Frank said. The Ikes are clipped planchets. As to value, ebay completed listings should give you some idea. Laminations are sometimes hard to...
Separate names with a comma.