And... right after saying that, here I go posting another US coin. ;) But hey, I don't have pix of any Swedish, so I had to go 1857, and so it...
I know what you're saying. It's all too easy to get jaded when it comes to US coins. "Been there, seen that." But US coins are world coins....
The 1883 V-nick looks great in there. You can get slidemarks on the reverse of the silver Washington and have them not be so noticeable, now. ;)
That'll be a nice find if it is indeed missing a clad layer and not a coin that's been acid etched or whatever.
[IMG] [IMG]
Wow. Totally would've fooled me, of course.
Less than ideal pix. Nice coin. I bought it twice, not initially realizing I had owned it before when I bought it the second time. Guess that...
Thoroughly awesome.
Got any Norway or 1814 or 1964? ;)
You can redeem yourself by playing another killer goldie WITH a date on it, as soon as the opportunity arises. :)
That one's a wild card. Norway or 1964 OR 1814!
Always loved that type.
Sorry, but this one falls afoul of the terms of the OP: (Bold emphases from the original.) Believe me, I've been tempted to break the rule...
Is that Livia at top left?
If it makes you feel any better, I no longer own that coin, so as with much of this stuff, I'm only showing off "bygones". ;) Some of my bygones...
I think you're talking about another issue. The point is, a coin WITHOUT wear CAN have been circulated. Circulation does not automatically equal...
United States: proof copper-nickel 3-cent piece, Liberty head type, 1888 [IMG] [IMG]
Gee... ya think so? LOL Stork gets the "Mistress of Understatement" title for the day. Sweet original looking 1833 CBH for ... junk silver?...
Separate names with a comma.
