My old porous example. [IMG]
Definitely nicer than my "budget" example. Both represent pretty good "bang for the buck", I think. I kinda like the bankers' marks on both...
Here's my old 44 AD BC JC denarius. An ugly duckling, sure, but hey, a lifetime issue, from that fateful year. And for less than 500 bucks....
The "44 AD" thing slapped me in the face as well. (Edited to add, after watching more of the video: Zlobin's fake laugh when he and Rick were...
Pretty coin.
[IMG] [ATTACH]
[IMG]
I agree that the first looks like Caracalla, but that's all I can say. PS- Arcadius on the last one, maybe? Neat equestrian reverse there.
With ten cats (and worse, a Pomeranian dog), I can tell you all about critter hair everywhere.
Yet another silver 3-cent piece to add to the two I already posted since we started this theme. [IMG]
Love token on 1854 dime. [IMG]
[ATTACH] (PCGS XF45) [IMG]
Pretty goldies, @ToughCOINS.
Maybe he recently purchased that. If so, I hope he didn't pay more than a quarter, since that coin is purely damaged and nothing else.
Stars on shield. [IMG]
You took that sobering news rather well. Good on you, mate. ;)
You're not the Clio that everyone on the Ancients forum talks about, by any chance? :nailbiting: If so, this stuff must be chump change to you......
Nicely done. I completed the entire Irish predecimal series, including the 1943 halfcrown, but lacking only the 1943 florin, in the three Dansco...
That's a pretty impressive conservation. I flunked chemistry in high school, FWIW.
55-58 was what i was thinking, too.
Separate names with a comma.
