Laminations and strike through's are pretty much the same value wise. I would rather find a lamination than a minor strike through.
There isn't much difference in the steps. I would go with #2 despite the toning on 1. It has much less contact and better luster. @BlackberryPie...
That is a lamination Vicki.
True I am just a little stingy with my money. I would rather have more coins than to send it off for an opinion. That may change one day.
I am also on the fence of 66/67 FSB.
You can grade my coins anytime just make sure it is in a PCGS gold shield slab.:p
I am at 4.5 on the Norfolk. When ever you want to call it @ddddd Or am I supposed to?
I took another photo. Problem is it is an absolute give away. So here is a clue. Why is the coin at a slight tilt in the slab? @paddyman98 @JCro57...
I can see the error clearly, But, I also know what it is. Do you have a guess on grade?
Although this is planchet related it is not struck on an incorrect planchet.
That is exactly what it is. Incuse Machine Doubling. http://www.error-ref.com/?s=incuse+doubling
So, again @David1611 this is a fake two headed coin, whether you can get it apart or not. The seam is present. Even if you don't believe it, the...
If no one guess's correctly today I will post another photo this afternoon/evening.
This is not a partial collar.
Gotcha
The mush on the OP's coin is seen on cents from about 68 till 82. Yours at least matches Wheat die Obv and Rev designs. It's much more...
By the way this coin was stored it is I believe a monster by the terms of Buffalos. I give it a 5.7. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
AU has been accommodated with many XF's, just like MS has many AU intruders. I think a simple standard is the resolve. A hard cut off, square the...
[ATTACH]
Not a weird finish, that is gem quality, without the coin roller marks.
Separate names with a comma.