They look OK to me, though I should warn you that I am not at all an expert, and ancient Chinese coins are often faked. These, however, I don't...
Wow, that LIBERTAS sestertius puts the one I posted to shame!
I like the grey tone on that one, @Orfew.
That was what I was told for the "News and Notes" section. 400 to 600 words. I suspect you're right about the invitation thing. I am an...
Especially when they're a few centuries old! It would be one thing if you collected moderns that were readily available in MS. But circulation...
Yes. Such an algorithm would be helpful, at least to weed out stuff like this. I've seen some 18th century gold coins with a high value in the...
Though I don't have firsthand knowledge, never having had an issue, I think they do still buy back their mistakes, though NGC does not guarantee...
Merged the two duplicate posts.
Pictorial love tokens seem to be rare on gold host coins. This is the only gold pictorial I can recall seeing, at any rate. The engraving is...
Nice pickup! Are you a Capricorn yourself? I am. Not that that means anything. I love the type, and will take any excuse offered to post mine...
Galba and Nerva do seem quite sourpussed on most of their coin portraits, don't they? [IMG] [IMG]
Doubt you'd find many buyers above melt, but it's a handsome medal.
My point is that nobody is going to go through the trouble to do that every time one of these glitches is spotted, though if there were a "report...
I'm not referring to updates. I'm referring to glaring errors. I have seen this ridiculous glitch again and again. Here. Look at this listing....
This blanket statement is partially inaccurate. I say "partially" because sure, sometimes it's true, but very often (in fact, I'd say more often...
Article submitted. Squeaked it in just under the September 15th deadline (for the December Numismatist), and 10 words below the 600-word limit....
That reverse-proof contrast is trippy-lookin'. Nicely done as usual, @spirityoda.
Pop.1 is one thing (might be significant, might not). But pop.1 and top pop is another thing entirely.
Excellent. Thanks. And thanks to @Circus, especially.
Thank y'all for the status updates. The summary in Post #187 has been updated accordingly. So it appears that as of this post, we're just...
Separate names with a comma.
