I wish you could post pics, Chris - do you at least have a scan of the the Ostrogothic?
[IMG] Little bit of schmutz on an otherwise gorgeous coin. Do you think I should try to clean it?
Nice looking set, Eng. I especially like the sandy patina on Anastasius.
Exceptional detail and centering on that coin. Well-done!
I've never used anything but acetone on coins, so I can't recommend that product - I just know it's out there.
http://vimeo.com/38717742
I wouldn't worry about China. The only way they're going to get rich is if we pay them all the money we owe them, and that's never going to...
Thems fightin' words, bub. They are NOT interchangeable! They have different dates. And mint marks. Ahem... :o
No, I need a remote shutter switch or something of that nature. I jiggle the camera when I shoot.
What's in that slab anyway, Kevinfred? I can't make it out...
Maybe the graders could use more than 7 seconds?
:eek: I was just about to make a wisecrack about how easy it is to confuse the two, and then you post this!
It's no big deal in my book. I've got a few pretty beaten-up slabs - my consolation is that the damage is on the holder and not the coin.
Great history lesson, thank you. And to be able to say your specimen is better than the one in the British Museum, well, that's a lot of icing on...
I had no idea the Pope could just up and resign, until I heard the news. But it's been 600 years since it's happened, so I suppose a lot of people...
Yes, but one man's art is another man's rubbish. Here are the reasons I don't like that design. I grew up in the Catholic Church during the era...
They're dark coins, Steve. There's nothing I can do about that. Well...there's always MS70. :p
Anacs is authenticating Daniel Carrs? Hmmm....I guess you wouldn't want any fake Kennedys out there. :confused:
Another for practice... [IMG]
Well, that listing ended. I had a feeling that would happen once I posted the auction, lol. It's been a good exercise anyway.
Separate names with a comma.
