Yes the dies were a little beat up, A lot of dimes and quarters from the D mint look like this. I tend to find them every year. It is a strike...
Surfaces look subdued, and a hint of the lightest surface wear. MS64
I here ya, just passing on that condition is usually the key to seeing errors and variety's. I have sold a few coins, and my enthusiasm isn't tied...
I fully agree on the struck thru. What is interesting is what doesn't show in the photo. Maybe a little_____. but hard to justify without in hand...
If you look closely the scratch goes over the M in Dime. That makes it PMD. I would encourage you to find out what Mint state looks like on a...
I was really hoping this thread went a little farther than it did. There were some interesting topics brought up by a few members. I was hoping...
I have yet to find an acceptable 2 cent piece for my collection. One day, And I am sure I will pay up.
We got to get you cropping your coins. Leave the extraneous back ground out of the photo. Nice Gulden Potty.
Not Chuckie Cheese, Here is a Show Biz. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I haven't yet, but will take a look over my inventory of Jeffersons. Who knows, It is a neat variety, or should I say two.
@cladking @Lehigh96
Seems tho that there are a couple High D's. Who was the numskull that had control of the MM punch?
How much does it weigh? I only see an environmentally damaged quarter?
Link?
I have never heard of the variety till today. Thanks for the heads up folks. @Danomite
That does seem to be a little high in placement. But not an error of any kind.
I kind a figured you were gonna say that. Hopefully he sends it in to be attributed by either VV or Wexler. Did he say which RPM he thought it...
It's impossible to see from the small photos. I don't see that as any evidence towards a variety.
https://www.coinsandcanada.com/coins-prices.php?coin=1-cent-1910
This is pretty unusual to not be able to nail down the variety. Any luck with your Coneca guy @Rick Stachowski ?
Separate names with a comma.
