[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
If the Barber is a proof, not sure? I would say that the surfaces have been altered. Something just looks off to me.
FS 501 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@Rick Stachowski Which are you saying DDR-015 or DDR-005? I don't see either one as a possibility close. MD is what I think.
The MM does not look to be in the right position. Maybe @1stSgt22 can check the coin and get back to us.
I went 65*, but probably got a grade bump for the toning.
I went 65+. meant to hit the * for eye appeal. The luster is real nice, just too bad about the contact on the shoulder.
Don't be fooled Acetone can and will change the wrong coins for the worst. Study what you are removing,
That isn't a FB or FT Roosevelt. The bands are incomplete especially the lower one. The bands need to fully run to the edge of the torch and be...
This one came out at the same time. Has the original design that VDB used to design the Lincoln cent[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I went AU 53. It is really hard to tell if it is the lighting or wear.
Old newbie photos it is actually a light grey in color.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Tripled die obverse.
I agree, meant to say damaged.
It all depends on the buyer. To most of us it is worth 10 cents. A circam is when a coin is heavily toned to the terminal stage and wear or heavy...
SDC Severely damaged and corroded.
If they are full then it would be called FT Full torch. Cool find.
Separate names with a comma.