[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Have you checked that 20S for an RPM? the MM position looks close to correct. http://varietyvista.com/02a LC RPMs Vol 1/1920SRPM001.htm
I think that some clearer more detailed photos are in order @alurid There are some left over details that need to be answered before sending it in.
The second shows way more luster.
By the way, what looks like a carbon spot above the U of UNUM is a bit of retained grease or, die fill.
I here ya, It happens we all have a life to live. How's your brothers Franklin set coming along? We all enjoy your knowledge.
? Each die stage has compounded problems till the die is retired.
I was with you, I was looking at what first looked like minor pitting/roughness in the wear spots. Yeah, they weren't there.
I found the RPM RPM-066 It's RPM-066 http://varietyvista.com/05 JN RPMs/1943PRPM066.htm Thanks @Lehigh96 I was starting to think you were MIA.
I was looking at a few examples on Coinfacts. there are a few other toners that have streaky colorful toning....
@Paddy54 http://varietyvista.com/04a%20JN%20DD%20Vol%201/DDO%20Detail%20Pages/1943PDDO005.htm Brians variety's only shows 12 examples, and it...
This is very close to a FS-102 I am not very sure though. The MM on mine looks too far to the right. This P MM is also an RPM. It has the clash at...
Except that the live bidding jumps in 20$ increments.
Here is the 3rd of the Wartime Jeffersons in the set I bought last week. All opinions are appreciated. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Neat clash @Wal888
MS details cleaned.
AU58 MS61 I like the nearly shattered die on the second one.
I just don't see the details even with the circulation. The devices just look a little mushy to me. Especially Lincoln.
NGC MS65 PCGS MS64+
Better photos are needed for the spitting eagle. As for the DDO/DDR. It is all mushy details from worn out dies.
Separate names with a comma.
