Only struck at Philly? or is there an S mint also?
Not much brilliance to the Luster. 58 looks right.
I got told that scenario once, I called out a beautiful 79 CC/CC at a pawn shop, or was that 78? Anyways it was silver thicker and slightly...
One way to be sure that an error of this sort happened at this year in time, is to search the minting process of an 1802 coin. Just a thought?
Hong Kong 1951 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't see any doubling. Just a worn Nickel. You can check Brians Variety's https://www2.briansvarietycoins.com/listings
After 1989 there are no RPM's.
About 45 Deg.
Your right I missed that one.
Small strike thru on Lincolns High cheek bone. [ATTACH] Small strike thru at 10 oclock. I have found a few of these squirely marks. [ATTACH] Some...
I took some photos today of a couple 22D's. A few for small errors. But these are the only two I took both sides. First one just had an...
That depends on the luster. I think it has the eye appeal.
Cool circ find Larry!
And thats another reason to be here on CT. There are both collectors and dealers that are willing to give their knowledge away for free. Ps First...
It would depend on the year, and if they have been searched.
MM were hand punched into each individual working die, before they were hardened. This happened up until 1989. So, MM placement can vary...
The 64 set is definitely proof. Could they be from different sets, YES. After market holders aren't anything new, and wouldn't worry about the...
That is an after market holder. Proof sets in 1964 were sold like this from the mint. https://www.govmint.com/1964-united-states-proof-set
Weight/tolerance level is nearly a full gram on Ike dollars. Just a slightly thicker planchet.
Not all proofs have a frosty look. This the difference between Proof, Cameo proof and Deep Cam proof.
Separate names with a comma.
