You have that backwards MD is flat and shelflike taking the thickness away from the raised device. Any kind of scraped look is a form of die...
How about you tell us why we wouldn't see that? You seem to know more than us.
It's always neat to find a 69 with any kind of doubling. BUT, That isn't a doubled die it is MD, machine doubling, worth a cent.
It's OK Larry, You just don't understand.
Not much to look at compared to others in this thread. Heres mine. Septimius Severus AR Denarius. 197 AD. Obv: L SEPT SEV PERT AVG IMP VIIII,...
Sorry Larry this is not an error and flattened reeding is very common. @Burton Strauss III posted the above, and it isn't any of those type errors.
The collar is the device that creates the reeded edge when the coin was struck. Yes as the coin is used the reeds wear and are removed/flattened...
If you have to view it at an angle then it is definitely environmental damage, Stick it in a roll or flip and come back to it after you have...
Simple circulation will wear the reeded edge. Circulation will also wear the surfaces and remove weight. It really is impossible to tell from...
These Microscopic photos don't help as said above. It is all environmental damage. I did not happen at the mint.
At 12.5 cents on the dollar? No Thanks. The only coins that I send to one of those is from metal detecting.
Yeah, the hands would definitely get washed after the look of that one.
Whats the weight and diameter? Looks like it could be lead.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Where's the sweat shop, Do you even sleep?
Nice Ultra Cameo Weasuluv.
Didn't know that. The main two authors were Fivaz & Stanton. 5th volume ll had Potter contribute, and the 6th Volume l had Ellis as a third.
Great early stage Clash.
They all look broadstruck except the 2013P.
Neat error, err variety, do you have any better photos?
Separate names with a comma.
