Put it into a flip, find it in a few years and use your knowledge to affirm what you wrote, That could easily be a linear plating blister.
That last Photo sure had a lot of Luster in it. Excited to see NGC's grade.
I don't see much offset in the design, not enough to call it a retained cud. Nice rim to rim @meandyou4ever0
I went 65 6FS I also think the carbon spots keep it from 66.
Not seeing anything.
The The first tell is square rims. A proof will easily roll on it third side. A chamfered edge on the outside is not found on proof coins. Second...
Just Pickin Revello, I have never bought from an auction or over the internet. Hopefully your post got plenty of attention.
Way to give us a heads up!
Hey @Barry Murphy I know you are ancients, what is going on?
MM placement is not correct.
Looks closer too this one. 1954-S RPM-002 (varietyvista.com)
I would think that the juiced photos were Heritages.
It could be just get rid of the glare on the high points.
I think that most Horse's would buy the coin and not the plastic.
I think we have a member here that has a struck thru gold cent. I am almost positive I have seen photos.
Closest I got is a Cuba from the Greater Antillies, [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I thought I had a Puerto Rico couldn't find it this morning. No one else has one, huh?
O have never seen tat on any of the TPG's sites, nor ever heard the statement. That just says that they don't even guarantee their grade. It could...
It really all depends on the condition of the coin. Most RPMs are worth a couple of bucks in circ condition. If MS then they can easily go $10-$20...
I see plenty of luster left on that coin, not enough to be MS. But too much circ to be a 58. I like it as a 55 CAC.
Separate names with a comma.
