Oh, I know. I was agreeing with your rhetorical question.
I have thought this as well. At least put the hi-res Photovision pics (when a coin has them) on the cert page, like PCGS does with its TrueView...
I don’t, really. If I find something eye appealing, its technical grade is a secondary consideration.
Good on you for playing the “nominate another” card, FF02.
Yeah, me too. There’s a reason I pay the pros to shoot my better stuff.
What a smile! :)
Pet pics are purely optional, and just for fun. You covered the bases.
In my recent experience, NGC Photovision has proven to be at least the equal of PCGS TrueView, if not even better sometimes.
I agree. I paid extra for the service, of course.
I thought you meant the Alexander the Great tetradrachm, and was all like, “bronze disease? Whuh?” LOL
Yep! Small, but gold. A Celtic quarter stater of Cunobelin.
Got these three around the same time. The Cunobelin quarter stater and Hadrian sestertius were in the same auction. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
