I have been looking thru a $50 bag of 63D hoping to find one. At one time there was a 73' that looked almost the same, but it was debunked.
Neat variety, I hope you didn't have to pay too much.
It was the wrong answer. But sounded good.
I am glad someone posted it. @Twyzm your looks like a later die stage than what is shown on VV. Nice find!
I spent a little bit of time this morning looking up the variety. This is the same reverse die that was used on the 1833 B-1. The reverse design...
I know what there business model is. There are plenty of coins that get a sticker that are over graded by at least a point or 2, some IMO 3-4...
We can also add in the variety aspect. If it is an unattributed rare die pairing, then one should expect to pay a higher price.
Link?
DO you have it in hand yet? Are they all BU?
MS64+
After 1989 the MM were added to the working hub and not the individual dies. So, rpm's cannot happen. What you have is mechanical/machine doubling.
Actually Paddyman has it right. The abrasion doubling has been "debunked" Here is a reference for abrasion doubling....
My best guess is that you are looking at Abrasion doubling. Notice the heavy die polish in the fields.
We have a few auction house's here in the metro. I used to go every once in a while. There weren't many deals to be had on coins. Unless it was...
Nice find and a cool error. It still would be nice to see the reverse side of the coin. I would get that into an airtite. So that it doesn't get...
MS61 PL
Those are part of the planchet, or called unstruck planchet roughness. Only a partial factor in the grade of a coin.
No worries we are all incorrect. Maybe you can teach us how 200+ years of numismatics supports your theory.
I caught some better scenery with these photos. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
None of what you did is going to change the terminal color. Someone said above to definitely dilute the Ezest if you use it, I agree. Also, the...
Separate names with a comma.
