My brain does not compute without pretty pics!:snaphappy: Pop out preferred!:troll:
Nice coins, Seth
A mistake that turned out to be real good, who would have thought? Thanks to Doug for pointing out the mistake and John for making the mistake:p
Nice coin, thought I had him, but it's a Galerius :o
Nice bronze, I just have a half follis. [img] Justinian I, (527-565 A.D.) Ae 1/2 Follis O: DN IVSTINI-ANVS PP AVG,Diademed draped and cuirassed...
Lol, nice find.
Nice tokens.
Thanks Looks similar to mine. Still not sure if mine is attributed right.
Nice, I still want to get one.
Thanks Yes, and some are better silver than others. Many, the reverse is nearly all missing too. Ones with an intact reverse go pretty high :(
I have wanted a Hun coin of this type for a while, finally acquired one. I know @Ancientnoob has some. [IMG] HUNNIC TRIBES, Western Turks,...
Even though I focus a lot on Lucilla coins, that is rough/interesting at the same time.
I have a heavy Gallienus, but not like that. [img] Gallienus (253 - 268 A.D.) AR Antoninianus O: IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG, Radiate and cuirassed...
A beautiful coin, nice weight to it too from the looks of it.
Beard of the horseman being so long?
Looks Ok to me. And as JA said, all ancients have been cleaned. It's overcleaning that can be a turn off too come.
I'd like one of those double silver examples but have yet to get one. [img] Tacitus (275 - 276 A.D.) Æ(S) Antoninianus O: IMP C M CL TACITVS AVG,...
A type that drew little replies when posted, which is typical, but is special either way. [IMG] Philip I (244 - 249 A.D.) Egypt, Alexandria...
Nice shield on it, Randy.
Nice example, SA.
Separate names with a comma.
