OK, obverse has two die chips. Reverse marks I believe are just slight damage but some may be die chips as well. Die chips were very common on...
Looks like a few die chips, must have been struck with a die that was nearing the end of it's run. I don't believe there would be any extra value...
Philadelphia, no mint mark.
Definitely fake, no question on this one.
Keep us posted, but don't get your hopes up.
Seems to be some misinformation about this coin going around. Perfectly normal common coin. I can assure you they are not "going" for $10,000!...
It is most definitely just damaged, there is no way anything like that could happen in the minting process.
Welcome to the forum. Your coin is worth one cent. Are you asking because of the damaged area?
Looks to be a normal well circulated quarter. Is there something specific you see to make you ask?
I have seen average condition steel cents sell for fifty cents or so, but yours is pretty rough. The 1944 is even worse so I would say face value...
Post some pictures of your coins and someone will be glad to help. If your "1776" coin matches the one in this thread though, it is a fake.
It is more common than you would expect. With the billions of cents around they have suffered damage in almost every conceivable way.
Who certified it? It isn't in a slab.
I don't see any error, just a normal well worn walking liberty half.
Just a normal 1990 cent, worth, one cent.
The rear penny? I think you'll have to be a bit more specific! Welcome to the forum!
Not worn or damaged, the zinc would be showing through if it was.
Like the others I only see a normal corroded quarter. Virtually no chance it is struck on a silver Canadian quarter. Anxiously awaiting edge...
Small date 1982 cents are very common and worth face value. It is the copper small date 1982 D that is valuable.
Looks like a plating blister.
Separate names with a comma.
