If you are talking about the blobs around the date, they are not errors just plating blisters. The copper plated zinc cents are notorious for...
I believe the mint mark was punched in after the die was completed, so the mint mark would not be doubled on a doubled die.
Check post #17, Paddyman just explained it.
Definitely real, it is the "copper" ones where you need to look for fakes.
Yup, ground, not clipped.
Could you post links to these that are selling for big money? From what I can see these all look like face value.
That is a 1974 not a 1994, is that the coin you are talking about? Nothing unusual about a 1974 without a mintmark, it just means that it was...
I agree, both large.
Very slightly underweight, not unusual.
Just a normal, really rough, Jefferson nickel.
Really damaged quarter, pictures are not great but it looks like some bubbling due to heat damage.
Did you read this thread? If it is a circulated coin just spend it, there is no collector value.
Someone just stamped it, nothing like that could happen at the mint.
Sure post some pictures, we should be able to help.
I think you will have to be more specific about what kind of expert looked at the coin, and what did he or she do to come to this conclusion....
Looks like a normal quarter with 35 years worth of wear and abuse.
No cents in 1966 had a mint mark, so that is normal. Weak letters on the reverse is nothing special either. Could be 52 years of wear, or they...
Nah, that is just badly damaged.
That is what a nice circulated war nickel is supposed to look like. 73 years of patina!
Not a real quarter, note on the obverse it says "close quarters".
Separate names with a comma.
