Actually there were some made in silver, although they are much rarer than pewter or brass.
No, not a chance.
Just some random hits on the coin. Can't be a mint mark error if it is not a mint mark.
The copper plating can tone in many different ways depending on what it has been exposed to.
The assumption would have to be zinc unless you weigh it and find it is not.
I just found a 2018 post on the NGC forum where someone posted a coin with the same lines below in. Another poster had an identical coin with the...
Got it, thanks.
Looks like it is just really rusty.
Between January 31st and February 8th you sent it to Heritage, they attributed it, sent it back, then you sent it to Stack's and Bowers, they...
Agreed, no.
They are just badly damaged, still worth one cent each though.
I believe someone cut down a cent, possibly to use in a vending machine as a dime. The reeding is most likely file marks. I am sure more...
I for one believe your 1966 eagle is every bit as genuine as your 2000 silver cent.
Just a normal 1971 cent.
A 1971 cent? Seriously, is there something in particular you want to know about it?
I see some random marks, circulation damage, could be a small die chip or something, nothing more.
All were struck on the same size planchets, no difference between regular strike, sms and proof. That is very slightly overweight, might have...
3 grams is a little light, would account for the reverse having been ground off.
About the only chance of finding one is from proof sets that haven't been checked. You are not going to find one in circulation.
Tough to say how many are still around. I wouldn't put much stock in how many have been graded, many, maybe most, colonial collectors prefer...
Separate names with a comma.
