Looks normal to me.[ATTACH]
The coin has had a hard life. It's damaged.
@Jason Hoffpauir Your up.
Lets move on. It got the bean. [ATTACH]
Lets go here. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't know what it is. Looks like a scratch with staining over it. [ATTACH]
If you knew anything about coin images you would understand that those dark areas are color, not black. They were shot flat to the lens to show...
There are rules here about that and for good reason. New folks would post the same thread on every forum. Some already do that and the mods have...
They go in the forum that is already there for each of those. That's where the most people will see and learn from them.
Back to the topic coin. These images were taken by messydesk. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Wrong place to post this Jason. Please edit it.
Thank you @Paddy54 Great information. I bought it from Bowers about 30 years ago because of the strong clash. That was my passion in those days....
"I think Cointalk should have a separate category for Counterfeits and Altered Coins" I don't mind either way but I feel that fewer members will...
A lot of stuff gets set up to renew automatically. Some even give a discount if you agree to let them do that. I had something renew a while back...
I really like the packaging. Looks much better than what was used in the past.
This thing has many clash marks all over both sides. I'm wondering if the line going thru the date is a clash or a die crack. It may line up with...
PCGS 66 Did it bean? [ATTACH]
The second image makes the coin look cleaned. I don't see that in the first image. I can't tell much about the luster on the obverse. The reverse...
I agree. The N in ONE is the first thing to look at. This is what it should look like. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
