After watching deer out of our windows for years, I have to conclude that they are pretty smart, and without a doubt can just be playing because...
A fox is not big enough to take down a deer. A rabbit, OK, but not a deer. Even a turkey is too much for a fox. When they spread their wings and...
I should have mentioned that the 1916 obverse was re-engraved and is the best of the series. Here, for comparison, is a 1958 proof. All the fine...
It’s amazing how proof-like the 1916’s can look. I had to go look up the registry to look up @robec ’s cent, to see that it was not actually a...
[ATTACH]
Essentially I agree. I prefer the O to be full, so my coins are generally selected for their strike. Frankly, I am at a loss as to why this isn’t...
I am not sure that is die wear on the O of ONE. The opposite side of the planchet is where the main part of Lincoln’s bust is formed. There is...
MS 65 RD
Seems like we should complete 1912. [ATTACH]
I have an example of the coin, and my source has always referred to it as Satin. This is the Jefferson nickel business strike, followed by the...
I believe the issue is not the size, but the care taken setting up the photo. This is a screen capture from GC that I cropped a bit. You can zoom...
Larry - congratulations on having your thread reach 15,000 posts - and on you being the first and 15,000th poster.
You’ll save some money by not having to buy a 1922 No Date. Since this is simply a mint error I would not put it in either. This display is...
Here’s a regular 1964 business strike for comparison. Pretty sure yours started out looking more like this. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
