Wow. Your skills are impressive, my friend. I really like the even distribution of light in your pics. I know this can sometimes wash out luster...
Agreed, and if the TrueView image is making this coin look better than it actually is, then I’d hate to see what it looks like in hand. I think...
Lovely images (Justin?), and I’m really diggin’ the peripheral toning.
That is low. I like it.
I don't normally buy rounds, but lately I've had the urge to get something different. These high relief rounds really spoke to me as I LOVE...
I just ran across this 1884-O, graded MS65. Now, perhaps it’s a difference in lighting between the TrueView images, but I’m trying to figure out...
That’s what I was wondering too. Sort of looks like it.
Yeah, the first photo makes the coin appear much better. He did good posting 2 different shots.
I was too scared to say 67. LOL.
This listing popped up in my saved searches. It looks better than a 64 to my eye, but maybe I’m missing something. What say you?...
It looks like a 66 to me.
Yeah, me too. LOL.
I’m the exact same way, which is why the 18/7, 3-legs, and all the blank empty holes in my buffalo nickel Dansco are filled with hobo skull...
Yes. This is what I’m currently doing with my Franklin Half set- replacing the proofs with circulated examples. I want a consistent circulated...
I have enjoyed all the responses so far. Thanks. I never thought about the possibility of finding a PL. Now I’m intrigued.
;)
I beg to differ as well. Grading really is this kind of elimination process. It was with THIS particular coin. It was EASY to grade- took 2...
Does anyone here regularly buy these, and if so, how do you store them? What is your ultimate plan for them? I’ve played with the idea of buying...
Hehe. No, it’s much more straightforward than that- a simple process of elimination. There are too many marks for it to be a 68, and it’s too...
Yep. Luster suffers the most under their photography. It’s not terrible, but it’s no TrueView either.
Separate names with a comma.
