Well, they aren't busties, but they sure beat the designs that replaced them...Barbers AND Morgans. 8.85
Actually, that implies that 99.9% of collectors don't NEED CAC; it says nothing at all about whether or not 99.9% of collectors either do or don't...
Thought better of it....:oops:
Not my pic, but it could be... [IMG]
I'm PCGS free...and NGC free...and ANACS free. All it takes is a couple of snips.
This was about 4 years after the burglary. I got the info from the seller as to when and where he acquired that piece. Going back to the dealer...
I bought this one back from an ebay seller a couple of years after it (along with most of my bust half collection) was stolen. It was still in my...
In other words, that "cotton" constitutes a "real dollar" whereas that silver constitutes bullion--NOT A DOLLAR.
Looks to be 115...and NICE!
No, a $1M coin is EXPENSIVE--it may be or it very well may not be rare. That is determined solely by how many exist. How many people may want...
So, 100 years is too long to express a claim, but 80 isn't. Good to know.
So point out the differences. And remember, I'm simple minded.
Question...Are the 1913 Liberty nickels next? By this reasoning they obviously should be. I mean, at least 5 planchets were illegally converted...
I've never submitted a coin for certification, either. I have, however, UN-certified a around a hundred or so coins over the years. ;)
Biggest Ebay cherry was probably this... 1827 O-124 (R-5+) Bought for 52. Immediately offered 1100 even with the chicken pecks. [IMG][IMG]
Well, at least he ruined ugly coins (Morgans) instead of anything remotely attractive.;)
Rarity has absolutely nothing to do with demand. Price does. There is actually no such thing as a "rare" mercury dime or Lincoln cent. To...
[IMG][IMG] [IMG][IMG]
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Admittedly, my later bust dates are not as dark, but... [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG][IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
