[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I hate to miss this show. It should have been canceled way before now.
messydesk is correct. This is nothing new. It's the known cause for the look of your coin.
I agree. No question about it.
Not me. Too much risk.
I don't want to call it a fake from that one image. It's too far out of focus.
Decoration for something. Box or a post? Pretty cool looking.
Same here. More images of the shield would be cool.
Nothing, not even your fingers should ever touch the obverse or reverse surfaces of the coin. Don't use any tools for a dip or for an acetone...
It's fake.
I'm finished with you as well. There are better things to do than put up with your lack of understanding the truth.
Nice coin.
I'll go with 66+ Pretty coin.
This image may help. [ATTACH]
There is also 1857 quarters with clash marks from the cent.
The 1857 FE can be found with clash marks from the quarter, half and the $20 gold piece. The Cherrypickers Guide has them listed.
He only posted the 1892 over there and got about the same answers. I think he is new to forums and the hobby.
He went over to CU.
[ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
