Time for a restart. Something a bit more modern that more folks can play off of. 1940 or any Mercury dime. [ATTACH]
I read most everything that gets posted on this site and I just don't care what you have to say about me. I'm happy that you are so smart.
Cool. We can both laugh at each other. I'm good with that. Talk all the trash you want about me. It's not important.
I'm not seeing any doubling from the images. What I'm seeing looks like damage.
You won't find a person on this site that believes a word you say but we have a great time laughing at you. All the insults you put out there...
If you dip the coin it will look like a piece of crap.
None of these were ever sent in or that's why he is so mad at the services. They won't argue with him but the folks here will.
The man told you to send it to ICG and he would look at it and give his opinion. He wanted to help you and you just act stupid.
Five days is about the normal for any business or the mint. It's setup that way by the processing company to prevent fraud. The mint was correct....
Happy birthday guys. Hope it's a great one.
AU requires a certain amount of luster. I'm not seeing that with this coin.
The coin that is the topic of this thread has lost most, if not all of it's luster. The surfaces are dull. The person that cleaned the coin really...
63
I'm at AU something. Probably cleaned at some point. Nice coin.
I'll change my vote to 65. Looks much better in the new image.
Those images are really bad. Not a good way to prove anything.
Images are still out of focus. I'll guess it's somewhere between 58 and 63. You might try pulling the camera a bit further from the coin.
Pretty cool.
1999 P. Worn die.
Separate names with a comma.
