Exactly. Look at the difference in the chins (shape), but not fake differences. Others as well, but pretty sure it's a genuine article.
AU...details to me...at least been wiped/rubbed...based on today's TPG "standards"...but have seen sliders get by with older coins, so may...
Me, too...see the marks but can't "see" a star. Like the blot test...different folks see different things.
The reveal was too soon for me...just getting to the morning mail after church...but I'm just one of many, so whatever. Was going to say...
Gosh, I just HATE that acorn-nut thing posing as a "shield"...bad. If the Lincoln Memorial pre-2009 isn't coming back...and in this day/age given...
Am going with a 64...maybe 65...but only because I can't clearly see the breast feathers, if a weaker strike or just the lighting/angle, shadow,...
I always worry about toning like that on the reverse. Will go 66+/*, maybe 67.
But as the GSAs in early 70s were from the mint...not commercial as in TPG or other private, etc...wouldn't the early SMS (65-67) and proof set...
Wow...a real beauty, but am concerned about the toning, if natural or somehow applied/mfg. Otherwise, looks at least 67...maybe 68.
PF63...where was that...?
Well, I haven't purchased enough from foreign sources to become well-acquainted or savvy with foreign exchange rates, etc. Other than something...
I don't see this sort of thing much differently than phone scams for various inferior/cheap services and merchandise, insurance, et al, targeting...
Spot-on, indeed.
Wow...now THAT (1807) is one beautiful coin...! They're all nice in their own ways but this one stands out for obvious reasons.
Don't leave it outside unless totally up/away...protected/out of reach...from animals that might consume it. Bad. Call your local...
Is this a 56 Type B...or another year Type B..?
Be sure and check your 56 Washington for a Type B reverse.
I'm a bit confused, also...if just a little bit...but with these bits of information and explanation it's becoming a bit clearer. :woot:
Have read/compared all so far. The one thing I agree with is that there are/can be ever-slight differences with details (you know...that the...
Amen...agree...and I'm not particularly picky about them. They're either FULL, end-to-end across, or they're not. I have the feeling this may be...
Separate names with a comma.
