I'll go with #2 being a higher grade.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Pretty coin. I would have it graded but that's just me. I'm trying to stay with NGC and PCGS slabs in my type set.
Fun coin.
It's also a disgrace to give someone such a hard time over something so stupid. Both words were used in books and publications for many years....
It's a scratch. It's not possible to know what caused it. Just damage.
Most of your images are really nice.
There are a lot of good folks here that love to help others. Being almost blind and looking for error coins is going to be really tough. It's hard...
I see nothing that looks like doubling. I do see an image that's out of focus.
post mint damage
[ATTACH]
Return the coin if possible. I don't believe the coin is real. If I'm wrong it still has no value.
You were told that you have a normal 1955 cent and that is what you have. The only 1955 DDO that has value will look like this. I hope you can see...
Early proofs are fun. The surfaces have many different looks with angle of lighting and lens. I believe the services cut these a bit of slack on...
64
The coin was ugly when it was struck.
I have to agree with the PCGS grade. Hairlines are normal for a proof of this age and grade. Nice looking coin.
Fun coin. Thanks for sharing.
Separate names with a comma.
