A mighty fine job chiseling along Jefferson's nose.
Is Ron's Morgan still legal tender?
There is a prominent radial die break, a true radial since it goes through the center of the coin, and other die cracks. Jim
I'm a firm believer in a diffuse light source to get an unbiased photo of a coin, which is needed to avoid shadows and highlights. Although...
This new pair look much better. I can see they are the same coin. The little brother has a great looking Reverse. But what is that mark on GW's...
And then there's the pricey "Deluxe Edition" of the "Official Re Book."
It's hard to believe these photos are all from the same coin, or were they not the same?
If the lighting is not diffuse it can cause all sorts of strange photographs,
My first reaction was no doubling. Then I saw the splaying of the legs of the 5 and 9 and the fat 8, clearly showing in the smaller photograph.
That's not an esoteric calculation. Just taking measurements on the monitor I get 10% off. (On my screen it was 3/4 divided by 7.) So your dog...
I've been getting them daily, and looking forward to them, And thank you for sending birthday greetings.
I had begun to believe I knew what a Lamination Error was, and not surprised to find it could be more than just a peeling away of metal from a...
Could this be a die clash? At least this would dispel the hallucinations.
Radial die cracks are new to me but the straightness of these cracks look almost radial but not truly pointing to the center. That is still true...
That 9 looks well formed compared to the G in GOD.
it looks more like an illusion.
Tried a sonic cleaner on an old coin. It did a fine cleaning---and exposed some large scratches.
Is there any explanation why the upper section of the Obverse and the lower section of the Reverse are less sharp? Was this part of the coin...
Fake or not, the coin looks like it has been bleached. at least on the Obverse.
The coin you show is 1968D.
Separate names with a comma.
