ha,, yeah me too..... I've found myself opening the thread up a few times since it was posted just to look at that rev again.... sweet .... I bet...
1878 - looks like more chatter than I usually see on 63's,,,, so would grade it as MS62, and then +1 for my tendency to be conservative... so back...
dang it,,, i was hoping for that honor... I'm recognizing a lot of outstanding pic graders in this group,, will be interesting.
I'll say 64n1 here.. yet another tough one to n1,, especially with the reverse spot, which I'll guess was not as prominent when graded. btw,,...
love that reverse... 64n1... another ngc that I had a hard time giving the n1,, but it's been working so what the heck. 1918's are one of my...
45
lol... IMO outstanding !, and true ?......... I may put an "IMO" at the beginning and question mark at the end of all my posts from here on out...?
found this: http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=9841 and a funny blurd in the thread.. lol....: "Meddle not in...
IMO - huh,,, sounds like it may be good advice to recommend to each forum member that they start thier post with "IMO".
So let's say, just hypothetically, that I do prefer XYZ to ABC, and everytime the issue comes up in the forum (on numerous occasions) I simply...
Could you provide an example of each and where the border is ? example - " I think xyz tpg is cruddy " > ? libelous ? " and I think auction...
Just a passing thought and curiousity.... I remember another site where you couldn't even post a certain TPG's name because that TPG has sued...
Separate names with a comma.
