You and paddy have convinced me. Just not sure about that color.
Color looks way off. Unnatural
That is damage
Ahhh. Got it. Well, my post is for an error coin. Did you get a good look at it?
Exactly what are you saying here, my friend?
I got this from @Fred Weinberg a couple weeks ago. What a beauty! I do not ever remember coming across any of these at local shows, and the ones I...
Thanks. Working on a book as well. Trying to have one of every kind that I collect (wrong planchet, off center, missing clad layer, broadstruck,...
Several times on off center Ikes I found no one bids despite a nice starting price, only to be outbid with several people bidding the last 2...
Oh, how I forget you like to do your research on my stuff. Here ya go :) [ATTACH]
I picked this up after I contacted an eBay seller to maybe end an auction early since no one had bid yet. Seeing that a 20% off-center went for...
The cent on dime is absolutely 100% legit. If the dime also showed the date as the cent does, it would be worth a little more. And the more...
So, you feel it is in fact a partial clad layer? I keep going back to the error-ref part that if the copper core is exposed, it is not a...
I think I finally got it. Thanks, my friend.
I think I am going to go with that it is in fact a partial clad layer, and not simply a lamination. I based this on the error-ref definition, a...
This is from error-ref, and is why I thought it is a partial clad layer and not a lamination; the copper core is definitely exposed. See below....
I apologize to everyone for maybe not understanding. Let me put this another way... On the dime I posted, the red area is the copper core. It is...
I see that, and I know it is a lamination. I am just confused as to whether or not it is also by default a partial clad layer since that part of...
Hmmm...Then why does it appear copper-colored? the plating over the copper core is an alloy (copper-nickel mix) that is one solid color.
So if I am reading your response correctly, it is still a parital-clad layer as it now exists, correct? it just came off AFTER it was struck.
My understanding is that a coin missing its clad layer, in full or in part, is a form of a lamination error. So just wondering why this is labeled...
Separate names with a comma.
