Oh, Man. I know some don't care, but I hate fingerprints on coins.
The OP's coin could actually be a missing 4 "ghost" cent that also has corrosion damage in the same spot.
Actually, it would be "Voice-to-text..." (You have been out-Nazied!)
Modern coins (not bullion) since the mid-1980s are pretty much only worth more than face value if they are errors or for those of you who buy MS70...
Looks like someone cleaned it with a pencil eraser
Why do people who have an internet connection ask questions that can be easily answered by looking up the information themselves?
Oftentimes, especially for those who are or ever have been government employees, the best piece of advice is this: Think INSIDIE the box
How about "I'd rather give insults than get results." Or "I won't ever get this truly remarkable coin certified that you idiots say is damaged!"
For me, the best part is trying to figure stuff out
Ahhhhh. Got it
I dont see whats wrong with the label
I am looking to do an informational website where I can post my coins and provide historical touches to each piece, links to clubs, and even...
I bet someone submitted multiple coins and NGC mixed up which ones went in which slabs. The original owner then sent them back to be corrected and...
No doubling. Circulation wear
[ATTACH] What does it weigh? Now i am thinking zinc and that last number is the top of a 4 for a 1984 date.
Niagara Frontier Coin Club Buffalo Numismatic Association CONECA ANA
Looks like it is copper, despite what looks like zinc on the reverse. I believe the date is 1981.
The OP's coin is most certainly genuine. Actually, I agree with it being at or near MS63.
I appreciate some of you are genuinely curious. But the thought that somehow copper was mixed with aluminum is absurd. Maybe, and that's a big...
Because the appearance of the coin is all we have to analyze, which definitely looks and matches a reaction with chemicals, which also supports...
Separate names with a comma.
