Luster bomb. 67.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Thought I’d some of these got melted with the weight change. One I don’t see often
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] I actually bought a couple coins last night after basically nothing for a couple years. Maybe I’ll start doing coin show’s...
I liked at 63. I could easily see in a 64 holder though especially with the luster and good strike. Without the couple marks this one is a gem
I’ll make an interesting note about the first rectangular mark. See the couple evenly spaced lines across the mark. Bears consideration what...
You aren’t kidding. Almost looks like it’s plugged. I wonder if it corresponds with the 8 of the date. As the coin looks screwy there too the...
Planchet flaw. Not the end of the world. Surface looks like it’s got other problems too . Early copper has a lot of issues often and often...
Honestly I don’t remember. I’ve had them for quite a few years. Probably got in 2018 or 19. But I bought quite a few.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Ms 66 bn cac
[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Presidential coinage and bullion rounds. It’s fairly well known I don’t care for presidential coinage or...
89 -cC so bloody expensive in high grade even cleaned I find it highly unlikely
I was guessing 63. And could actually be nice if proper conservation went well. Still has good luster
Top almost believable. Bottom looks like it wa in Chernobyl
Very nice. Yeah I don’t see cleaning and the trade definitely high vf. I’d have called it 30 I’d have probably called the $20 a 63. The cheek a...
Nice haul of silver. Especially the barber stuff
Separate names with a comma.
