It definitely has an off look. Especially the mintmark and grainy surface. I’m not saying absolutely fake. But very questionable
I’m actually not surprised by the cac. It has the original skin and look they like
Pretty Larry. I’ll go to it’s bigger and branch mint cousin [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Absolutely. Unless you could read. Or knew the eagle was different and faced differently
On second look I think i may be a little low. Monster luster and eye appeal
O 116. I’m going to go ms 62 I really don’t see true circulation. And definitely less than most cbh that are au-58. But I do see some bag marks...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Good album coin. Ton of meat for the money
Xf 40 I’m between 35 and 40. But I thought the skin and good remaining luster gives it the xf. I actually think some of it is some strike weakness
[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Did grab this last night. Seller pics. Vf 20 my call. I’ll send in eventually if i ever do the pile that needs to be done
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Wonder what they’d say about this one. Older holder ngc. 66 bn cac Definitely not reholdering it.
I don’t recall Pcgs doing any of that. I know most of the red copper I’ve owned was in pcgs slabs.
Owned a ton. So yeah. Now a chain cent is a coin I’ve never owned
Ugh. It’s a plague. I don’t know which is worse. Counterfeits or Covid. And both with the same origin
[ATTACH]tough to see in pics. But right between the 18 and 61. Aka. WB 13 bisected date speared olive bud. CSA issue
Not extreme. They used to execute counterfeiters
I voted 53 as 50 wasn’t an option which was my feel
Separate names with a comma.