23 minutes is not enough time to dream?
Or, you hold a 10x loupe against the camera's lens, and adjust your distance from the coin to focus in and see if that helps. [ATTACH][ATTACH]...
I thought that myself Doug, but I gave the benefit of doubt on the pic quality. They are somewhat blurry.
F-xf
Take a 10x loupe, and hold it against the lens on your camera, and adjust the distance between your camera and the coin to get as sharp and close...
+1
I wouldn't go higher than $27.50 on it myself.
Looks more like mechanical doubling. As far as the rainbow on the face, it's toned some. My 85 proof set has the same toning on the quarter,...
I'll confirm that. It is a 1985S Roosevelt proof. So what's the error?
Agreed with MorganDude. Straight on pics are better to see the fields, and devices and get a better look at everything that may be going on.
I don't use coins to cause something. That's what I have a brain for.
There are some who collect die crack coins, and very small, if any, premium. I have several in my collection, including some late 50s Washingtons...
69s are better than 70s, and more reasonably priced. MS/PR70 is nothing but marketing. The average collector couldn't tell the difference between...
Obverse side, I can see a die crack on the hair bun under T and Y in LIBERTY, and a smaller one right off the bottom of the bun. Numerous...
[ATTACH] This is a good book to learn about grading. Most all collectors use it. Your 87-O has a lot of wear to it, looks G-F. The 98, I can...
He would have wanted retribution in blood, the seller dragged over hot coals, and maybe a kick south of the border for good measure. Me, I would...
The above quote, is your statement. Which is what I asked you about, and you've yet to answer that. Instead I find a snippy message in my inbox...
Yes I understood that quite clearly. My reading comprehension has always been great.
NFN, but anyone can claim to be anything on the internet.
Separate names with a comma.