Nope
Nope. Never found a cool error in circulation yet
You can see the "M" of MONTICELLO in front of his brow, and the "O" on the back of his head, be it upside-down.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
There is no way this coin would be bent upon impact the way it is. The dollar has reeding, which means it was struck completely inside the collar....
That's nothing. Those are not even my photos. Mine are much better, like these... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Not genuine
This is a ragged perforation (blow hole)
Firat I ever owned
What's the error type?.....Go! [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
not double struck
I actually found out the info on the PCGS stage. They actually first determine if it is authentic first during the grading stage
If your coin is in the grading stage, does that mean it has already been determined it's genuine and not a fake or an altered coin?
Mike Diamond already confirmed it is an unaltered coin and is a major greaser Not a weak strike (die adjustment). This is due to the very defined...
Nope. Not PMD.
Zinc
About 95% of the obverse and 85% of the reverse designs are missing. I haven't seen a cent with this many details missing on both sides. Monster...
grease strike through
Struck on 1 cent stock - not a cent-sized planchet - but the right size planchet for a dime, just cut from zinc cent stock. That is, if the label...
@Puddin'Farts 1964 is a banner year for fake die strikes on nickels. Here is mine, and there are several others. I open to the possibility it...
Separate names with a comma.
